2003 Mazda 3 vs. 1952 Toyota SA
To start off, 2003 Mazda 3 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Toyota SA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Toyota SA would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1952 Toyota SA. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1952 Toyota SA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Toyota SA weights approximately 30 kg more than 2003 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 3 | 1952 Toyota SA | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 3 | SA |
Year Released | 2003 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2410 mm |