2003 Mazda 3 vs. 1957 Opel Rekord
To start off, 2003 Mazda 3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 1,680 cc (4 cylinders), 1957 Opel Rekord is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 3 weights approximately 310 kg more than 1957 Opel Rekord.
Because 1957 Opel Rekord is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Opel Rekord. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 3 | 1957 Opel Rekord | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | 3 | Rekord |
Year Released | 2003 | 1957 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1600 cc | 1680 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Top Speed | 182 km/hour | 140 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 40 L |