2003 Mazda 3 vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2003 Mazda 3 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 3 weights approximately 210 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 3 (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 3 | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 3 | Cedric |
Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2540 mm |