2003 Mazda 3 vs. 1962 Renault 8
To start off, 2003 Mazda 3 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 3 (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 3 weights approximately 520 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 3 | 1962 Renault 8 | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 3 | 8 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1600 cc | 956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2280 mm |