2003 Mazda 3 vs. 1965 Seat 1500
To start off, 2003 Mazda 3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1965 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1965 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Seat 1500 weights approximately 20 kg more than 2003 Mazda 3.
Because 1965 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 3 | 1965 Seat 1500 | |
Make | Mazda | Seat |
Model | 3 | 1500 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2660 mm |