2003 Mazda 3 vs. 1969 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2003 Mazda 3 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 3 (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 3 weights approximately 400 kg more than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 3 (187 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 3 | 1969 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
Model | 3 | Colt |
Year Released | 2003 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 187 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2360 mm |