2003 Mazda 3 vs. 1972 McLaren M19
To start off, 2003 Mazda 3 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 McLaren M19. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 McLaren M19 would be higher. At 2,992 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 McLaren M19 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 McLaren M19 (444 HP @ 10000 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 3. (160 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 McLaren M19 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 3 weights approximately 680 kg more than 1972 McLaren M19.
Because 1972 McLaren M19 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 McLaren M19. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 3 | 1972 McLaren M19 | |
Make | Mazda | McLaren |
Model | 3 | M19 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1972 |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 444 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 10000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 560 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2550 mm |