2003 Mazda 3 vs. 1980 Seat 127
To start off, 2003 Mazda 3 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Seat 127. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Seat 127 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 3 (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1980 Seat 127. (47 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1980 Seat 127. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 3 weights approximately 715 kg more than 1980 Seat 127. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 3 (140 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Seat 127. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Seat 127.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 3 | 1980 Seat 127 | |
Make | Mazda | Seat |
Model | 3 | 127 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 903 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 63 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2230 mm |