2003 Mazda 3 vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2003 Mazda 3 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 66 kg more than 2003 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 3 | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
Model | 3 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1600 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2680 mm |