2003 Mazda 3 vs. 1996 Mercury Villager
To start off, 2003 Mazda 3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 3. (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Villager weights approximately 490 kg more than 2003 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 3 | 1996 Mercury Villager | |
Make | Mazda | Mercury |
Model | 3 | Villager |
Year Released | 2003 | 1996 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 2960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2860 mm |