2003 Mazda 3 vs. 2001 Suzuki Covie
To start off, 2003 Mazda 3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Suzuki Covie. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Suzuki Covie would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 3 (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2001 Suzuki Covie. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2001 Suzuki Covie. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 3 weights approximately 510 kg more than 2001 Suzuki Covie. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Suzuki Covie (178 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 3. (145 Nm). This means 2001 Suzuki Covie will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 3 | 2001 Suzuki Covie | |
Make | Mazda | Suzuki |
Model | 3 | Covie |
Year Released | 2003 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1600 cc | 1327 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 2950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 50 L |