2003 Mazda 3 vs. 2008 Holden Epica
To start off, 2008 Holden Epica is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 48 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 3. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 3. (145 Nm). This means 2008 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 3. 2008 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 2003 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2003 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mazda 3 | 2008 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | 3 | Epica |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1600 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
