2003 Mazda 3 vs. 2011 Volvo C30

To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Volvo C30 (114 HP) has 6 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 3. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo C30 weights approximately 31 kg more than 2003 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo C30 (270 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 3. (140 Nm). This means 2011 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Mazda 3 2011 Volvo C30
Make Mazda Volvo
Model 3 C30
Year Released 2003 2011
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1498 cc 1600 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 108 HP 114 HP
Torque 140 Nm 270 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1420 kg 1451 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 4252 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1783 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1448 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2639 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 60 L