2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1954 Triumph 10 Break
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Triumph 10 Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Triumph 10 Break would be higher. At 1,989 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1954 Triumph 10 Break. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1954 Triumph 10 Break. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 620 kg more than 1954 Triumph 10 Break. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 1954 Triumph 10 Break | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | 6 | 10 Break |
Year Released | 2003 | 1954 |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 760 kg |