2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1956 Renault Fregate
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Renault Fregate. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Renault Fregate would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Renault Fregate is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1956 Renault Fregate.
Because 1956 Renault Fregate is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Renault Fregate. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mazda 6 | 1956 Renault Fregate | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | 6 | Fregate |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1840 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1270 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2810 mm |
