2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1960 MG Magnett

To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 MG Magnett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 MG Magnett would be higher. At 1,989 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1960 MG Magnett. (63 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1960 MG Magnett. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 240 kg more than 1960 MG Magnett. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1960 MG Magnett is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 MG Magnett. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 MG Magnett. (115 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 MG Magnett.

Compare all specifications: