2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1960 Porsche 718
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Porsche 718. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Porsche 718 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Porsche 718 (146 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (145 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Porsche 718 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 891 kg more than 1960 Porsche 718.
Because 1960 Porsche 718 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Porsche 718. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 1960 Porsche 718 | |
Make | Mazda | Porsche |
Model | 6 | 718 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1960 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 594 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2110 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 52 L |