2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1961 Volvo 220
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1961 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1961 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 305 kg more than 1961 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (165 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mazda 6 | 1961 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | 6 | 220 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2610 mm |
