2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1963 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (159 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 825 kg more than 1963 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (205 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mazda 6 | 1963 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | Mazda | Triumph |
| Model | 6 | Herald |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1147 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 159 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 205 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 69.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1605 kg | 780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 29 L |
