2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1964 Moretti 2500
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Moretti 2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Moretti 2500 would be higher. At 2,454 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Moretti 2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Moretti 2500 (143 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Moretti 2500 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 25 kg more than 1964 Moretti 2500.
Because 1964 Moretti 2500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Moretti 2500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (240 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Moretti 2500. (187 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Moretti 2500.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mazda 6 | 1964 Moretti 2500 | |
| Make | Mazda | Moretti |
| Model | 6 | 2500 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1594 cc | 2454 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 187 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1320 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2660 mm |
