2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1964 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,989 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1964 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1964 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 525 kg more than 1964 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 1964 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | Mazda | Zastava |
Model | 6 | 850 K |
Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 848 cc |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2010 mm |