2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1968 Renault 4
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Renault 4 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1968 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1968 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 955 kg more than 1968 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Mazda 6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Renault 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 1968 Renault 4 | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 6 | 4 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 747 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1605 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 38 L |