2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1971 Monteverdi 2000
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Monteverdi 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Monteverdi 2000 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 Monteverdi 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Monteverdi 2000 (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Monteverdi 2000 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 55 kg more than 1971 Monteverdi 2000.
Because 1971 Monteverdi 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Monteverdi 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 1971 Monteverdi 2000 | |
Make | Mazda | Monteverdi |
Model | 6 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 205 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1290 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2560 mm |