2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1972 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (164 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 555 kg more than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 1972 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
Model | 6 | Colt |
Year Released | 2003 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 164 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2360 mm |