2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1972 Zagato Ferrari 3Z
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Zagato Ferrari 3Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Zagato Ferrari 3Z would be higher. At 2,953 cc (12 cylinders), 1972 Zagato Ferrari 3Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Zagato Ferrari 3Z (251 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Zagato Ferrari 3Z should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6.
Because 1972 Zagato Ferrari 3Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Zagato Ferrari 3Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mazda 6 | 1972 Zagato Ferrari 3Z | |
| Make | Mazda | Zagato |
| Model | 6 | Ferrari 3Z |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1594 cc | 2953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2410 mm |
