2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1973 Suzuki LJ 20
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Suzuki LJ 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Suzuki LJ 20 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1973 Suzuki LJ 20. (27 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1973 Suzuki LJ 20.
Because 1973 Suzuki LJ 20 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Suzuki LJ 20 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Suzuki LJ 20. (37 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Suzuki LJ 20.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 1973 Suzuki LJ 20 | |
Make | Mazda | Suzuki |
Model | 6 | LJ 20 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1973 |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 358 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 181 Nm | 37 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |