2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Volvo 140 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Because 1974 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (240 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (157 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 6 | 140 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 157 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2620 mm |