2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1975 MG MGB
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 MG MGB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 MG MGB would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (144 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1975 MG MGB. (97 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1975 MG MGB.
Because 1975 MG MGB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 MG MGB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (310 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 MG MGB. (149 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 MG MGB.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 1975 MG MGB | |
Make | Mazda | MG |
Model | 6 | MGB |
Year Released | 2003 | 1975 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 144 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 149 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 80.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |