2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1975 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1975 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1975 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 75 kg more than 1975 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 1975 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | 6 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 181 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2700 mm |