2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1976 Opel Rekord
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 1,979 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Opel Rekord is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1976 Opel Rekord is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Opel Rekord. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mazda 6 | 1976 Opel Rekord | |
| Make | Mazda | Opel |
| Model | 6 | Rekord |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2680 mm |
