2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1978 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1978 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1978 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1978 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 140 kg more than 1978 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1978 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1978 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 1978 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 6 | Celica |
Year Released | 2003 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 181 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2640 mm |