2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1979 Seat 131
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Seat 131. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Seat 131 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1979 Seat 131. (132 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1979 Seat 131. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 345 kg more than 1979 Seat 131. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 1979 Seat 131 | |
Make | Mazda | Seat |
Model | 6 | 131 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1005 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2500 mm |