2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1981 Morgan 4
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Morgan 4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1981 Morgan 4. (96 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1981 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 520 kg more than 1981 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1981 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (240 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Morgan 4. (132 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Morgan 4.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 1981 Morgan 4 | |
Make | Mazda | Morgan |
Model | 6 | 4 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 132 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 825 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2450 mm |