2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1983 Ford Fairlane

To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Fairlane (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 285 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1983 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Ford Fairlane (326 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (240 Nm). This means 1983 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications: