2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1984 Reliant Scimitar

To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Reliant Scimitar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Reliant Scimitar would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Reliant Scimitar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Reliant Scimitar (135 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Reliant Scimitar should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1984 Reliant Scimitar.

Because 1984 Reliant Scimitar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Reliant Scimitar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (240 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Reliant Scimitar. (206 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Reliant Scimitar.

Compare all specifications: