2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1989 Volvo 440
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Volvo 440. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Volvo 440 would be higher. At 1,721 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Volvo 440 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Volvo 440 (109 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Volvo 440 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 315 kg more than 1989 Volvo 440.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (240 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Volvo 440. (143 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Volvo 440.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 1989 Volvo 440 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 6 | 440 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 1721 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 143 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 175 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1030 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |