2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1992 Renault 19
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Renault 19. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Renault 19 would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Renault 19 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Renault 19 (110 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Renault 19 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1992 Renault 19.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (240 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault 19. (160 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault 19.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 1992 Renault 19 | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 6 | 19 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 160 Nm |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1085 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2550 mm |