2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (138 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mazda 6 | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 6 | FTO |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1994 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.4 seconds | 6.5 seconds |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2510 mm |
