2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1994 Porsche Karisma
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Porsche Karisma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Porsche Karisma would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Porsche Karisma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Porsche Karisma (268 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (119 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Porsche Karisma should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6.
Because 1994 Porsche Karisma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Porsche Karisma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Porsche Karisma (336 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (186 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1994 Porsche Karisma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 1994 Porsche Karisma | |
Make | Mazda | Porsche |
Model | 6 | Karisma |
Year Released | 2003 | 1994 |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 336 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |