2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis

To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis (209 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (119 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis weights approximately 295 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Mazda 6 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis
Make Mazda Mercury
Model 6 Grand Marquis
Year Released 2003 1995
Body Type Station Wagon Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1840 cc 4600 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 119 HP 209 HP
Engine RPM 5700 RPM 4600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1420 kg 1715 kg
Vehicle Length 4710 mm 5400 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1980 mm