2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1995 Plymouth Neon

To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Plymouth Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Plymouth Neon would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Plymouth Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Plymouth Neon (131 HP @ 5850 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (119 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Plymouth Neon should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 311 kg more than 1995 Plymouth Neon.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (186 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Plymouth Neon. (174 Nm @ 4950 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Plymouth Neon.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Mazda 6 1995 Plymouth Neon
Make Mazda Plymouth
Model 6 Neon
Year Released 2003 1995
Body Type Station Wagon Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1840 cc 1996 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 119 HP 131 HP
Engine RPM 5700 RPM 5850 RPM
Torque 186 Nm 174 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 4950 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1420 kg 1109 kg
Vehicle Length 4710 mm 4370 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 79 L