2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1995 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,762 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Toyota Celica (114 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 250 kg more than 1995 Toyota Celica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (240 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Toyota Celica. (154 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 1995 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 6 | Celica |
Year Released | 2003 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 1762 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 154 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1095 kg |