2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1996 Nissan Terrano

To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Nissan Terrano. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Nissan Terrano would be higher. At 2,663 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Nissan Terrano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Nissan Terrano (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Nissan Terrano should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Nissan Terrano weights approximately 505 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Nissan Terrano is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Nissan Terrano will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (240 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Nissan Terrano. (221 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Nissan Terrano.

Compare all specifications: