2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1997 Tata E
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Tata E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Tata E would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Tata E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Tata E (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Tata E should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Tata E weights approximately 25 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 Tata E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Tata E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (240 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Tata E. (210 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Tata E.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mazda 6 | 1997 Tata E | |
| Make | Mazda | Tata |
| Model | 6 | E |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1997 |
| Engine Size | 1594 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1370 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2810 mm |
