2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1999 Saturn SL
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Saturn SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Saturn SL would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Saturn SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1999 Saturn SL. (100 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1999 Saturn SL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 365 kg more than 1999 Saturn SL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (165 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Saturn SL. (158 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Saturn SL.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 1999 Saturn SL | |
Make | Mazda | Saturn |
Model | 6 | SL |
Year Released | 2003 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1400 mm |