2003 Mazda 6 vs. 1999 Suzuki C2
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Suzuki C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Suzuki C2 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Suzuki C2 (251 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (164 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Suzuki C2 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 613 kg more than 1999 Suzuki C2.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Suzuki C2 (284 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Suzuki C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mazda 6 | 1999 Suzuki C2 | |
| Make | Mazda | Suzuki |
| Model | 6 | C2 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 164 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 207 Nm | 284 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 852 kg |
