2003 Mazda 6 vs. 2000 Subaru STX
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Subaru STX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Subaru STX would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Subaru STX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Subaru STX (165 HP) has 61 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Subaru STX should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Subaru STX weights approximately 265 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Subaru STX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Subaru STX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (240 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Subaru STX. (224 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Subaru STX.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 2000 Subaru STX | |
Make | Mazda | Subaru |
Model | 6 | STX |
Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 165 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 224 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1610 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2660 mm |