2003 Mazda 6 vs. 2000 Volkswagen Hac
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volkswagen Hac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volkswagen Hac would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volkswagen Hac (149 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (144 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Hac should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 154 kg more than 2000 Volkswagen Hac.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 310 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles. 2000 Volkswagen Hac has automatic transmission and 2003 Mazda 6 has manual transmission. 2003 Mazda 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Volkswagen Hac will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 2000 Volkswagen Hac | |
Make | Mazda | Volkswagen |
Model | 6 | Hac |
Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1896 cc |
Horse Power | 144 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 310 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 1331 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2520 mm |