2003 Mazda 6 vs. 2001 Nissan MM
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan MM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan MM would be higher. At 2,956 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Nissan MM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan MM (153 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (119 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan MM should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan MM weights approximately 415 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan MM (372 Nm) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (186 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan MM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6. 2001 Nissan MM has automatic transmission and 2003 Mazda 6 has manual transmission. 2003 Mazda 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Nissan MM will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 2001 Nissan MM | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 6 | MM |
Year Released | 2003 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 2956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 372 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1835 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 1530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 106 L |