2003 Mazda 6 vs. 2001 Skoda Fabia
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Skoda Fabia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Skoda Fabia would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Skoda Fabia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Skoda Fabia (128 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (119 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Skoda Fabia should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Skoda Fabia (310 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (168 Nm). This means 2001 Skoda Fabia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6. 2001 Skoda Fabia has automatic transmission and 2003 Mazda 6 has manual transmission. 2003 Mazda 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Skoda Fabia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 2001 Skoda Fabia | |
Make | Mazda | Skoda |
Model | 6 | Fabia |
Year Released | 2003 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 168 Nm | 310 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2470 mm |